Saturday, March 30, 2013

Before Newtown: Mental Illness & Murder in a New Hampshire Family

© 2012 by Chris Benedetto, all rights reserved. The material on this website cannot be reproduced or quoted without written consent from the author. Endnotes indicating sources may be found at the bottom corresponding to numbers in the text.

In this post-Newtown massacre world, the ineffective treatment of people suffering from mental illness and tragedies like the one which transpired in Connecticut have become the proverbial elephant in the room; everyone knows it is there but no meaningful action has yet been taken. While the hereditary nature of mental illness and the murder of a mother by her disturbed son may seem like profoundly modern phenomena, the shocking history of the Kendrick family reveals that this same debate over mental illness, violence, and what to do about it was raging more than two centuries ago.

 In the Congregational Cemetery in the quiet town of Hollis lie for eternity several members of the Kendrick family, but their impressive slate headstones reveal nothing of the tortured existence and demise. For example, the marker of Daniel Kendrick Jr.http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=76005626 has customary sentiments of mortality from the late 18th century inscribed on it, but tells nothing of the circumstances of his death, and perhaps for good reason. One must delve into the print media of their time to learn the real story.

The May 25, 1790 issue of the Concord Herald reported that thirty-year old Kendrick had "in a fit of delirium, finished his existence by hanging himself in his barn. His wife found him suspended by a bridle, which she immediately cut and set him down...but Death had closed him in his iron jaws!"
Even more disturbing at the end of this obituary was the following disclosure: "It is a little remarkable, that the father, and a brother, of Mr. K. had died of delirium, in the course of a year." Could this actually be true?

The sad headstones in Hollis silently speak to us. On March 17, 1789 twenty-two year old Caleb Kendrick, Daniel's younger brother, had indeed passed away, though we will never the true cause of his death http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=76006995. Their father Daniel Kendrick Sr., a Revolutionary War veteran and town selectman, died soon after in May 1789, and his gravestone can be viewed here: http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=76005685.

For the remaining members of the Kendrick clan, which included included thirteen year old John Kendrick, his older sister Hannah, and his mother Hannah, these must have been dark days indeed. They had buried three men of their family within a year but tried to preserve some sort of social decorum and normalcy by hiring New Hampshire stone carver John Ball to erect markers in memory of their loved ones. For more than a decade, the Kendricks persevered until another devastating tragedy would claim the surviving members of the family.

"Melancholy Relation": April 1805

Fifteen years after the dark days of 1789-90, the youngest of the Kendrick children John had begun to exhibit signs of the same mental illness (possibly depression) which had claimed the lives of his father and older brothers. The newspaper reports of the time are eerily reminiscent of those which followed the Newtown massacre; they tell of warning signs ignored and failed attempts to avert an impending tragedy. According to Amherst's own newspaper, John Kendrick "for several years past discovered symptoms of insanity; but had generally been able to conduct his business...and when well, was sober and regular in his deportment." (1)

But in April 1805, his behavior had become so alarming that the Kendrick's neighbors went to their house and "made his situation the subject of conversation with his mother and sister, who, though sensible to his derangement, were unwilling anything should be mentioned to him, or that it should be generally known." Like Nancy Lanza more than two hundred years later, Mrs. Kendrick was unfortunately paralyzed and lulled into a false sense of security by  innate love for her son, and the refusal to believe that John was capable of doing harm to himself and others;  "This reluctance in them undoubtedly arose from the severe sufferings which the family had before experienced , in consequence of insanity...The mother and sister doated on this only remaining son and brother...and therefore were unwilling his failings should be made public." But this inability to face their family's issues would cost them their lives.

At nine on the morning of April 22, John Kendrick appeared like a demon at the door of his neighbor, "his hands red with blood...for his mother, he said, was dead, and his sister nearly so." When the alarmed neighbors arrived at the Kendrick homestead, they were greeted with a revolting scene of carnage. Mrs. Kendrick had been  "mangled in a manner to shocking to relate" and his sister inflicted with twenty fatal wounds with various tools and objects in their house, "such as the leg of a chair, a cane, a hammer, a pair of tongs...To describe the scene of horror would be too much for the finer feelings of nature." John Kendrick was immediately placed in the town jail, where he awaited a trial that never came. Below is a haunting description of him in the wake of the murders of his sister and mother:

One cannot blame John for not wanting to wear the clothes splattered with his mother's and sister blood, which suggests he was certainly capable of feeling remorse for his deadly deeds. But it is ironic that in the weeks that followed, the household goods and even clothes of the Kendrick family were sold off. I wonder who would have purchased the vestiges of this horrific tragedy?

 

By the time of this public auction, John Kendrick himself was dead, perhaps from sickness or suicide. (2) The fact that he was buried near his victims, and his father and brothers who had all committed suicide is in itself interesting, as there was a tradition in Anglo-America to not allow the bodies of those who had committed suicide to be buried inside the sacred ground of a cemetery. In fact, not too far away in 1806, when a man in Hallowell, Maine murdered his family and killed himself, diarist and midwife Martha Ballard recorded that he was buried in the middle of the road outside the cemetery. (3)  But in a span of a few months, new headstones appeared in the Hollis cemetery, which spoke nothing of the tragedy that had obliterated an entire family:
John Kendrick: http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=76006027

In June 1805, the remainder of the Kendrick's possessions were put up for sale, but one wonders who would have wanted to attend an auction at the scene of a double murder?



Apparently, the house was inhabited after the Kendrick atrocity, but according to a local history website, the house was haunted. It also affords us a view of what the haunted Kendrick home site looks like today long after it vanished: http://www.hollisnh.org/windowsonhollispast/historicSites/sitesAcrossHollis/sites/035-063.htm 

Like the media today in the wake of Newtown, newspaper editors in 1805 did not shy away from expressing what they thought should be done to prevent future incidents. In April 1805, the editor of the Farmer's Cabinet preceded contemporary calls for government intervention: "We would leave the fact on record, as a solemn warning, against allowing insane and distracted persons the privilege of doing mischief, by permitting them to go at liberty. We think it worthy of legislative attention." But in the wake of Kendrick tragedy of 1805, New Hampshire would take nearly another thirty-five years to erect a facility specifically for the treatment of the mentally ill. That is a story for another time. But the desperate pleas to improve the treatment of the mentally ill and protect those around them have remained unanswered because mental illness is still a taboo subject that has not received proper attention in our society. But if there is to be change, it must start in the homes of America, not the hollow halls of government.Unlike the Kendrick family, we need to stand united against our inner demons and not be ashamed to get our loved ones help if they need it. But let us hope we take more effective and immediate action in the wake of the enormous tragedy of our own time before it happens again.


Endnotes

1. Farmer's Cabinet, April 30, 1805. All subsequent quotes in this paragraph are from this paper, which was printed in Amherst for most of the nineteenth century.
2. Farmer's Cabinet, May 21, 1805.
3. Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, A Midwife's Tale: The Life of Martha Ballard, based on Her Diary 1785-1812 (Vintage Books: New York, 1990), 291-296.

Saturday, February 9, 2013

A Murder for Valentine's Day: Brutality in Brentwood

The origins of the contemporary Valentine's Day stem from ancient Rome when hedonistic pagan fertility rituals were the norm. Between the days February 13 and 18, young Roman men and women would gather for a festival near the cave of Lupercal on the Palatine Hill where it was believed Romulus and Remus, the legendary founders of Rome, had lived as children centuries before. As the festival progressed with animal sacrifices and scantily clad ceremonies, eligible bachelors with raging hormones would also find a romantic companion by drawing the name of an young lady in attendance out of a box or urn. Naturally, this time of year became a popular time for Roman marriages, and why we still associate this holiday with love and sexuality. 

But how did Valentine's Day get its name? Legend has it around the year 269 CE, Valentinus, a Christian priest,  was performing marriage ceremonies around Rome in defiance of the Emperor Claudius II, who had banned them because he desperately needed all able-bodied young men for military service to drive out the numerous invasions of the Roman Empire by Goths and other Germanic tribes. Claudius had Valentinus summarily arrested, but in his cell he scribbled "valentines" or messages to his followers. Perhaps by design for dramatic effect and intimidation of any others who might violate his marriage ban, Claudius ordered Valentine's execution on February 14, 269 CE during the Lupercalian Festival. Over the next century or so, Christianity became the official faith of the Roman Empire, and this February pagan festival was eventually replaced by the holiday on the same date to honor the martyr St. Valentine. For more information, click here http://www.americanantiquarian.org/Exhibitions/Valentines/origins.htm

But how does this connect to New Hampshire history? By the nineteenth century, the holiday to honor St. Valentine which we enjoy today had crossed the Atlantic. Below is a poem which was published in the Portsmouth Journal on February 13, 1830: 

 

Nearly thirty years later, there is strong evidence that the practice of exchanging valentines was quite popular in New Hampshire. For example, in the January 26, 1856 edition of the Dover Gazette appeared an advertisement for the shop of Daniel Lothrop opposite City Hall on Washington Street, where he sold a "splendid stock of Valentines" that could not  be "surpassed in the United States for cheapness, variety, or beauty." But on Valentine's Day in Brentwood in 1841, the hands of Richard Bean would not be carrying a message of love for his wife Nancy, but instead be stained red with her blood.

In a tragic irony, Richard and Nancy had just passed their fortieth wedding anniversary on February 6, 1841, a date which they may have chosen in the days of their young, budding love for its proximity to Valentine's Day.(1)  Over the subsequent decades, the Beans had a large brood of children but apparently all did not go well.  The following notice appeared in the May 13, 1822 issue of the New Hampshire Patriot & State Gazette:

 


Nearly 40 years later, it seems that Richard's lack of success in life had turned him into a bitter, alcoholic old man who took out his rage on his wife. On Sunday, February 14, Nancy Bean went home for supper after having spent a few days taking care of an ill neighbor.  One of her other neighbors who knew her husband's violent tendencies tried to dissuade Mrs. Bean from going home as "he thought she not would be safe with her husband." She declined this offer of protection, and it was a decision that would have deadly consequences.(2) 

The next morning, when the same neighbor passed by the Bean residence, he was shocked to see Mrs. Bean's contorted body lying on the ground near the house, nearly frozen solid by the temperature which had dropped to under 10 degrees during the night.(3) This man called out to surrounding neighbors who rushed to the scene. To their disbelief, they could see Richard Bean moving around inside the house as if nothing was amiss. When they demanded to know what had happened and why he had not carried his wife inside, Bean said "he did not know anything about it-he had only been to the door for a handful of wood, and had not seen his wife since Thursday."

 The listeners were incredulous, and pushing Bean out of the way, carried the frozen corpse into the house and sent for a coroner. Near the body, there were torn pieces of her dress, evidence of a "severe struggle" which had taken place. This crime scene would have been a goldmine for modern forensic examiners, but during this primitive era of criminal investigation, certainly some evidence of who perpetrated the murder must have been destroyed when the body was moved inside and the ground trampled under foot.(4) It makes sense that she was laid to rest in the Old Town cemetery in Brentwood, but I am still trying to verify that.

But when the victim was examined before she was buried, it was discovered that her nose was broken and she had suffered a "large" wound underneath her left eye. But apparently, none of these wounds could have caused death alone. Rather, it appeared at the time that she was attacked outside and left there, probably unconscious. Then, covered in her own blood, "she endeavored to return to the house and fell and died before reaching it." She had once married her husband with a warm heart flush with the hopes of youth in the midst of winter, and now forty years later, the frigid blast of February had sealed her awful fate. 

Contemporary reports had no doubts that that Richard Bean had committed this brutal atrocity, noting that he had been "for many years intemperate and abusive." But like many victims of domestic violence today, Mrs. Bean would not (or could not) leave him, caught in a cycle of violence and psychological manipulation. She "cleaved to him, labored hard for his support, and declined the invitations of her children-(some of whom are respectable and doing well in the world)-to take up her abode...with them." Her children must have suffered greatly knowing they had tried to save their mother but were powerless to avert this tragedy.

In September 1841, Richard Bean was tried for murder and was sentenced to thirty days solitary confinement and life at the State Prison in Concord.(5)  However, he was pardoned by Governor Samuel Dinsmoor in November 1849. Within a few weeks, Bean had died of "old age" in Lowell, Massachusetts on December 3, 1849 at the age of 72 years and six months.(6) But why had he gone to Lowell? It seems that was where one of his eldest daughters, Sophia, was living there at the time, and the nasty old man had no where else to go to die.(7) But the question will always linger, did Sophia forgive her father for killing her mother as he lay gasping his final breaths?

The image of a bloodied, beaten Nancy Bean martyred by her husband on the front yard of their home on Valentine's Day, February 1841 is a disturbing one that does not leave the mind easily. Perhaps the editor of the Exeter News Letter pondered this tragedy when he wrote of Nancy Bean:

"She did toil on and suffer till her sun went down in blood."(8)


Endnotes
1. Marriage Certificate State of New Hampshire, # 00456459, New Hampshire State Archives, Concord, NH.
2. New Hampshire Statesman & Journal, February 27, 1841.
3. Portsmouth Journal, February 20, 1841.
4. New Hampshire Statesman & Journal, February 27, 1841 (all further quotes come from this source.)
5. Dover Gazette, September 28, 1841.
6. Massachusetts Vital Records to 1849, accessed at www.americanancestors.org on February 9, 2013.  
8.  New Hampshire Statesman & Journal, February 27, 1841.